Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Long-term graft survival.

Authors: R, Mickey; Y W, Cho; E, Carnahan;
Abstract

1. Long-term graft survival is characterized by failure rates that are essentially constant after about a year or 2. The rate has not varied appreciably among cohorts defined in terms of transplant year. 2. Transplants with an excellent clinical course throughout the first 3 months (about 2-thirds of cadaver-donor first transplants) have substantially better long-term graft survival than those with a less favorable early course. 3. Having an excellent early clinical course did not remove the effects of the several factors related to long-term survival. 4. Use of cyclosporine did not relate to long-term survival. 5. Factors related to short-term graft survival (1 year), generally related to long-term survival and in the same direction. Cyclosporine use was a major exception. 6. The dominant factor for long-term survival was tissue matching as reflected in donor categories: HLA-identical sibling, parent, and cadaver. 7. Black recipients had a decidedly poorer long-term survival than recipients of other races/ethnicities. 8. Transplant center was a dominant factor in long-term graft survival. 9. Multivariable analysis did not materially alter the findings obtained from factors considered separately. This was attributable to the sensitivity associated with small standard errors resulting from the large number of cadaver-donor transplants and the combination of smaller numbers and longer survival of living-related transplants.

Keywords

Male, Biometry, Histocompatibility Testing, Graft Survival, Age Factors, Humans, Female, Registries, Tissue Donors, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!