Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

[Degrees of acceptance of local regional anesthetic techniques among hospital physicians].

Authors: J M, Campos Suárez; E, Hansen Ferrer; L, Trillo Urrutia; E, Catalá Puigbó; J M, Villar Landeira;

[Degrees of acceptance of local regional anesthetic techniques among hospital physicians].

Abstract

We have evaluated the acceptance of local regional anesthetic techniques (LRA) among the physicians of our hospital by means of an anonymous questionnaire. The people addressed had to choose, as if they were hypothetical patients, the type of anesthesia (general or local regional anesthesia) in four clinical hypothetical situations: interventions on upper limb (UL), on lower limb (LL), in an emergency situation and in a scheduled situation. We obtained 109 answers: 58 from medical specialities (cardiology, gastroenterology, internal medicine, pneumology, and radiology) and 51 from surgical specialities (general surgery, gynecology, ear, nose and throat, and traumatology). Local regional anesthetic techniques were the most frequently selected (p less than 0.001) and the main reason for selection was safety. Surgeons choose LRA more frequently than medical specialists but the difference was not significant. More information on such techniques does contribute to an increase in its acceptance, a fact which is clearly reflected in the medical staff of our hospital.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Anesthesia, Conduction, Medical Staff, Hospital, Humans, Female, Middle Aged, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!