Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Comparison of Rebound tonometry versus Perkins tonometry in the supine glaucoma patient].

Authors: A M, Schild; A, Rosentreter; M M, Hermann; P S, Muether; S I, Schroeter; A, Lappas; J F, Jordan; +1 Authors

[Comparison of Rebound tonometry versus Perkins tonometry in the supine glaucoma patient].

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the concordance of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements in the supine glaucoma patient using a Perkins applanation tonometer (PAT) compared to the iCare® rebound tonometer (RT), a hand-held device requiring no local anaesthesia.73 left eyes of 73 glaucoma patients were included in this consecutive case study and measured both by supine Perkins applanation tonometry and by right lateral posture rebound tonometry in the supine position (RLP). The patients were divided into three subgroups dependent on IOP (SG-1: 0 - 15 mmHg, SG-2: 16 - 22 mmHg, SG-3: more than 23 mmHg).The mean deviation between RT and PAT was 2.6 ± 4.0 mmHg, the 95 % confidence interval was -5.3 to 10.4 mmHg. 69 % of the measurements showed deviations within 3 mmHg between the two devices. Deviation was smallest in SG-2, and largest in SG-3.Rebound tonometry is comfortable to use even in supine patients. RT measurement agreed overall significantly with those of Perkins applanation tonometry, generally overestimating PAT measurement. In high IOP values, RT did not correlate as well with PAT as in moderate IOP levels.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Manometry, Reproducibility of Results, Glaucoma, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Supine Position, Humans, Female, Intraocular Pressure, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest.
    13
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest.
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
13
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!