
Preventing the spread of drug-resistant tuberculosis is a clinically important challenge. In this effort, rifampicin (RFP)-resistant gene examination by line probe assay (LiPA) was evaluated for its clinical application for rapid detection of tuberculosis.The RFP-resistant gene was examined in a total of 110 samples of sputum obtained from patients that were definitively diagnosed with pulmonary tuberculosis by auto-LiPA. The difference in detection sensitivity between the results of the smear and culture examinations was evaluated. Culture-positive samples were compared with the results of the drug susceptibility test.Smear-positive samples were LiPA positive in 69 of 73 samples (sensitivity: 94.5%), and smear-negative samples were LiPA positive in 25 of 37 samples (67.6%). More than half of the samples were LiPA positive, even those that were culture-negative or contaminated. Comparison of the 76 culture-positive samples with the results of the drug susceptibility test found that all samples were wild type among the RFP-sensitive strains. Among the 8 RFP-resistant strains, 6 were mutation type. All samples shown to be mutation type were obtained from patients with multi-drug resistant tuberculosis.Using LiPA, the amount of smear can be used as a factor for detection of RFP-resistant genes. Detection was possible even with culture-negative and contaminated samples, allowing more rapid diagnosis of patients with multi-drug resistant tuberculosis.
Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant, Sputum, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Rifampin, Antibiotics, Antitubercular
Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant, Sputum, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Rifampin, Antibiotics, Antitubercular
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
