Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Removal of autologous activated CD4-positive T lymphocytes also results in increased colony-forming units in patients with low and intermediate-1 risk myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors: Zhang, Zheng; Xu, Feng; Li, Xiao; Zhang, Qianqiao; He, Qi; Wu, Lingyun;

Removal of autologous activated CD4-positive T lymphocytes also results in increased colony-forming units in patients with low and intermediate-1 risk myelodysplastic syndromes.

Abstract

Autologous activated CD4(+) T lymphocytes (CD4(+) /CCR5(+) double-positive cells) that derived from BMNCs of patients with low and intermediate-1 risk myelodysplastic syndrome were depleted or added to in vitro cultures. The BMNCs depleted of CD4(+) /CCR5(+) T cells exhibited significantly increased numbers of colony-forming units (CFUs). Conversely, the bone marrow mononuclear cells cultures with a fourfold augmentation of CD4(+) /CCR5(+) T lymphocytes exhibited no colonies in cultures in vitro. The apoptotic index (AI) of colony cells was decreased compared with that of preculture counterparts. After depletion of CD4(+) /CCR5(+) in vitro cultures, the clonal cells increased in patients with chromosome 5q- or 20q- abnormalities but remained unchanged in patients with trisomy 8. In addition, after removal of CD4(+) /CCR5(+) T cells, the number of CFUs was increased in those patients with a higher number of BM Th1 (CD4(+) / IFN-γ(+) ) cells, hypocellularity, or bearing the DR15 allele. We concluded that the selective removal of autologous activated CD4(+) T cells can increase the generation of CFUs. However, whether the increased CFUs consisted of cells derived from residual normal hemopoiesis or clonal hemopoiesis remains unknown.

Related Organizations
Keywords

CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Receptors, CCR5, Stem Cells, Autoimmunity, Bone Marrow Cells, Cell Count, Th1 Cells, Lymphocyte Activation, Risk Assessment, Lymphocyte Depletion, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Humans, Cells, Cultured

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!