The history of Entamoeba histolytica is very confuse and shows several wrong concepts about the parasite and its relationship with the host. The poor correlation between the prevalence of asymptomatic and symptomatic amebiasis originated the proposal of three explicative hypothesis, among them was the concept of Brumpt that E. histolytica comprised two morphologically identical species, E. dysenteriae and E. dispar. The application of modern molecular techniques irrefutably proved that E. histolytica was really a complex of two species, confirming the concept of Brumpt almost 7 decades later. Recent studies have identified in humans E. moshkovskii, morphologically indistinguishable from E. histolytica and E. dispar, a great genetic diversity within each of these species, and heterogeneity in virulence among E. histolytica strains. The redescription of E. dispar, and the recovery of E. moshkovskii from humans have had a major impact in our understanding of E. histolytica and amebiasis with important clinical and epidemiologic implications. This has led to the need of a reevaluation of the infection in terms of prevalence and morbidity in the global population and to study the geographic distribution, prevalence, and transmission pattern of E. histolytica strains in order to detect those with epidemiologic relevance and predict the risk of amebic disease in a population.