Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Uremic toxins: the case of protein-bound compounds].

Authors: Carlo, Basile; Pasquale, Libutti; Annalisa, Teutonico; Carlo, Lomonte;

[Uremic toxins: the case of protein-bound compounds].

Abstract

Uremic retention solutes, if biologically or biochemically active, are called ''uremic toxins''. The retention of these solutes has a negative impact on many functions of the organism, particularly the cardiovascular system. The classification which is applied today is based on the kinetic behavior of the uremic retention solutes during dialysis: 1) small water-soluble molecules ( 500 Daltons); 3) protein-bound compounds. The latter are the object of the present review. The most important among them are p-cresol, p-cresyl sulfate, homocysteine, phenols, and indoles. No interventional studies are currently available that show the effect of an improvement in the removal of protein-bound compounds on patient outcomes, simply because most of the alternative dialysis strategies proposed so far are not superior to standard dialysis in removing protein-bound compounds. The question as to how to improve the removal of these solutes therefore remains unanswered. Alternative strategies might include adsorption therapies, either administered orally or during the extracorporeal treatment. In conclusion, the uremic syndrome is a complex clinical entity which involves a large number of retention solutes, many more than the small water-soluble molecules. Dialysis strategies should therefore aim to remove not only urea but also retention solutes, mainly because middle and protein-bound molecules appear to be correlated more frequently with deleterious biological, biochemical and clinical effects.

Keywords

Indoles, Humans, Protein Binding, Toxins, Biological, Uremia

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!