
handle: 2086/15075
The process of desistance is underpinned by criminal justice practitioners building positive relationships with offenders as well as recognising their individual skills, strengths and agency (McNeill & Weaver, 2010; McNeill et al. 2012). Recent reorganisations within probation services in England and Wales, as well as a broader austerity agenda have reduced the capacity for delivering group-based rehabilitation interventions depleted. Digital technologies have been suggested as possible way of developing new interventions to achieve the goals of desistance, though their use is currently limited and uneven across the sector (Knight, 2015). Other sectors, such as healthcare, have been more proactive in developing their use of digital technologies to support the delivery of services and treatment. This paper examines the potential of two approaches to utilising digital technologies currently in use by mental health services: personal digital assistants and self-guided therapies. The aim of the paper is to identify the potential for their deployment in a criminal justice context.
Desistance, Digital Criminology, Offender Management
Desistance, Digital Criminology, Offender Management
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
