
Over the thirty years since Strindberg's comprehensive study, much effort has been invested in an attempt to formulate a clear-cut answer to the basic question: What is the success rate in endodontics? The discrepancy and disagreement as reported in the endodontic literature with regard to success rate and the influence of the various factors on treatment results, prompted us to engage in a thorough analysis of the major causes for the variability of the reported data. These causes are related to the design of the studies, the endodontic techniques employed in them, the qualifications of the operators performing the treatment and the complexity of the included cases. They are also related to the observation period in each study, as well as to the criteria that were used for evaluating the treatment results.
Time Factors, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Recurrence, Research Design, Dental Pulp Diseases, Humans, Quality of Health Care, Root Canal Therapy
Time Factors, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Recurrence, Research Design, Dental Pulp Diseases, Humans, Quality of Health Care, Root Canal Therapy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
