
Commonly the assumption is held that correct data only and always will lead to valid deductions. However, analysis of the literature reveals striking examples of erroneous conclusions based upon correct data. The present article intends to show that meticulously performed research in itself is no guarantee for correct conclusions. It appears that investigators, together with the "scientific forum" of their time, interpret the results of experiments in the light of accepted viewpoints, without challenging other or less likely explanations. And since this has happened to the best of us in the past, it is also apt to happen to us today.
Bone Development, Research, Skull, Animals, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Maxillofacial Development
Bone Development, Research, Skull, Animals, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Maxillofacial Development
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
