Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Do Not Forsake Me, O God. Doctrinal Representation of God, Dualistic Literalism, and Attachment to God

Authors: Eklind Kloo, David;

Do Not Forsake Me, O God. Doctrinal Representation of God, Dualistic Literalism, and Attachment to God

Abstract

The present study examines the relationship between individuals’ doctrinal and experiential representation of God, by inquiring for associations between dualistic literalism and attachment to God. By dualistic literalism is meant the cognitive beliefs that reality is dualistically divided into good and evil; that God has given humanity a complete guide to what is good, that should be interpreted literally; and that the consequences of not submitting to God, and thus being on the wrong side of this dualistically divided reality, are disastrous. A survey was administered to N = 105 respondents. The sample was limited to Christians who seek proximity to God while also believing there is a possibility of being separated from God. An attachment theoretical framework, where proximity seeking to someone perceived as stronger and wiser as well as anxiety of abandonment play a crucial role, was applied to the material. As hypothesized dualistic literalism was positively associated with anxiety in attachment to God, and negatively associated with avoidance in attachment to God. It cannot be ruled out that these associations are the result of a causal link where the cognitively held dualistic literalism affects the relationship with God.

Country
Sweden
Related Organizations
Keywords

religionspsykologi, gudsrepresentation, anknytning

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!