
handle: 2077/33940
political, partisan discourse or administrative productions. Website studies have been growing in importance in the literature, including critical ones. However, the study of institutional discourse has rather rarely been done with web-based data, and has been rather countryspecific. No such study exists for Belgian institutional-administrative web-based communication. We propose to critically explore the websites of public social providers under municipalities’s authority in Brussels (CPAS-OCMW).We propose a small corpus-based quantitative analysis to prevent over interpretation. We then go into details and provide a close-reading of the 19 websites’ texts (one for each municipality in Brussels). The aim is to provide a critical insight into what the discourse on those websites does in term of social categories, power and inequalities and how organizations act as state-apparatuses. The analysis showed the constructions and re-assertions about the social field as individualized, which were produced by the texts of the organizations studied. It showed the organizations as re-producing the system of institutions and conceptions rather than challenging or changing them in a context of institutional interconnectedness. An omnipresent rhetoric of voluntarism, professional competence and legal entitlement has been shown to obscure the social role of these organizations, and conversely, emphasize their top-down role.
Policy, CDA, Belgium, Critical Discourse Analysis, Welfare Services, Institutional Discourse, Online, Web-based, Institutions, Corpus
Policy, CDA, Belgium, Critical Discourse Analysis, Welfare Services, Institutional Discourse, Online, Web-based, Institutions, Corpus
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
