
handle: 2077/22675
The aim of this paper is to see how correlation changes across time across different indices. We have used a sufficiently large benchmark period of 20 years to have a better understanding as to how correlations1have changed. We compared the correlation in the 20 year period with 3 sub periods namely the Dot Com crisis (1999-2002), the Bullish period (2004-mid 2007) and the Financial Crisis (mid 2007-mid 2009). The results suggest that time varying correlation increases in bearish spells whereas bullish periods do not have a big „statistical‟ impact on correlation. This will have implications for geographical equity diversification since the premise of diversification has been that it lowers risk but a high correlation would imply risk might not be reduced to a certain extent as expected. Therefore, fund managers should take this into account when coming up with equity allocations.
MSc in Finance
GARCH, emerging markets, covariance, correlation, volatility, GARCH-BEKK, ARCH
GARCH, emerging markets, covariance, correlation, volatility, GARCH-BEKK, ARCH
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
