
handle: 2077/20466
Background: Hyperacusis has been described as an extreme sensitivity to environmental sounds. The prevalence of hyperacusis in a Swedish population is 8-9 %. A distinction is made between peripheral and central hyperacusis, where central hyperacusis has no influence on peripheral hearing mechanisms. There are a number of proposed mechanisms and models regarding hyperacusis, as well as there are proposed treatments. Purpose: As a literature study perform a systematic review and analysis of proposed treatments of hyperacusis. Material and method: The literature study reviews scientific papers relevant to the purpose of the study and the questions at issue. Scientific papers were found in the database PubMed. Result: Improvement followed by treatment is described as a wider dynamic range and/or a self rated improvement of every day life. The proportion of cases showing an improvement vary between 28,6 to 63 %. The selected treatment is primary influenced by the mechanism/model in favour. Effective treatments have shown to be long, consist several components and consist patients without hearing impairment. Discussion: The treatments of hyperacusis is highly influenced by Jastreboffs neurophysiological model. According to this model a treatment with soundstimulation will reduce activation of brain areas associated with fear. The unclear definition of hyperacusis does however lead one to question whether hyperacusis may be mistaken for loudness recruitment.
Audionomprogrammet
Audiology, hyperacusis, treatment, tinnitus and loudness recruitment, Audiologi, hyperakusis, behandling, tinnitus och loudness recruitment
Audiology, hyperacusis, treatment, tinnitus and loudness recruitment, Audiologi, hyperakusis, behandling, tinnitus och loudness recruitment
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
