
handle: 2072/87970 , 2072/97458
El análisis de criterios clásicos de rentabilidad, como la Tasa Interna de Rendimiento o el Cociente Beneficio/Coste, revela que, contra lo que se suponía, concuerdan con el criterio Valor Actual Neto si se aplican correctamente. Lo mismo ocurre con los viejos criterios Valor Final Neto y Anualidad Equivalente y los nuevos Demora Máxima de Beneficios y Plazo de Recuperación de Costes. Se demuestra, además, que para elegir entre dos proyectos mutuamente excluyentes, la aplicación de los criterios citados al proyecto diferencia o incremental es una condición suficiente para que exista concordancia con el criterio Valor Actual Neto.
Cost-eficàcia, Valor -- Anàlisi (Control de costos), Equivalent Annuity, Benefit-Cost Ratio, Maximum Delay of Benefits, Project appraisal, Cost Recovery Period, Difference Project, Internal Rate of Return, Net Present Value, Net Final Value., jel: jel:D92, jel: jel:Q28
Cost-eficàcia, Valor -- Anàlisi (Control de costos), Equivalent Annuity, Benefit-Cost Ratio, Maximum Delay of Benefits, Project appraisal, Cost Recovery Period, Difference Project, Internal Rate of Return, Net Present Value, Net Final Value., jel: jel:D92, jel: jel:Q28
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
