Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Thoracoscopic surgery].

Authors: Koichi, Kaneko;

[Thoracoscopic surgery].

Abstract

Thoracoscopic apparatus is essential in present general thoracic surgery. Historically, the first description of diagnostic use of thoracoscopy traces back to 1910 when Jacobaeus inspected thoracic cavity with cystoscope. In Japan, Kimoto treated lung tuberculosis by thoracic ablation with thoracoscope in 1944. Thereafter thoracoscopic procedure did not spread until 1990's when laparoscopic cholecystectomy had rapidly popularized in Japan. After 1992 many reports about thoracoscopic surgery or video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) were published. In the early years VATS was done only for spontaneous pneumothorax, and then indication of VATS had been gradually extended for lung cancer, mediastinal tumor and other thoracic diseases. Nowadays 40% of lung cancer operations are done by VATS in Japan. A thoracoscopic surgery is minimal invasive procedure in operations of thoracic diseases, but should not be mixed with a limited operation of the thoracic diseases. It is necessary to understand that these are different meanings. In VATS the technical procedures are different from the conventional general thoracic surgical procedures and operators have to take special trainings of VATS procedure. But at present we do not have effective training systems of VATS for beginner surgeons. Various training method such as training box, animal laboratory, virtual reality system are effective respectively therefore an accurate training system should be made as soon as possible. Operators should keep in mind that the procedure of VATS or standard thoracotomy operation is not a question and that the most important is to perform a smooth operation in adequate time for patients ease.

Keywords

Lung Neoplasms, Thoracoscopy, Humans, Pneumothorax, Thoracoscopes, Mediastinal Neoplasms

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!