Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

[Ventricular assist device].

Authors: Shunei, Kyo; S, Takamoto;

[Ventricular assist device].

Abstract

There are 2 kinds of artificial heart used for clinical patients with end-stage heart failure. One is a ventricular assist device (VAD) and the other is a total artificial heart (TAH). Only paracorporeal VADs are commercially available currently in Japan, such as Toyobo VAD and BVS 5000. Paracorporeal Zeon VAD and implantable Novacor LVAD were approved by the MHLW in the past but already disappeared from the Japanese market in 2005 and 2006. A little more than 1,000 LVADs had been implanted since 1980 in Japan until last autumn, while no TAH has been implanted in patients. In the world 1st generation pulsatile implantable LVADs have been taken over by the 2nd and 3rd generation non-pulsatile implantable LVADs in the past 10 years. In Japan 4 kinds of implantable LVADs are under clinical evaluation, HeartMate XVE (1st generation, HeartMate VE was used in the Japanese clinical trial), Jarvik 2000 (2nd generation), Evaheart (2nd generation), and DuraHeart (3rd generation). All 5 patients with HeartMate VE survived more than 1 year during the clinical trial, 13 patients with Evaheart were long survivors or successfully heart-transplanted. Although follow-up interval is relatively short, all 6 patients with DuraHeart and 5 of the 6 patients with Jarvik 2000 recovered from end-stage heart failure and are keeping very good condition. Most of them returned to their home and are waiting for heart transplantation. Especially the 3rd generation of non-pulsatile LVADs is expected to have long-term durability and less frequency of thromboembolic episode.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Humans, Infant, Heart-Assist Devices, Prosthesis Design

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!