Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[The midgut bacterial flora in lab-reared Anopheles sinensis].

Authors: Mei, Li; Lin-hua, Tang;

[The midgut bacterial flora in lab-reared Anopheles sinensis].

Abstract

To screen gram-negative bacteria in the midguts of lab-reared Anopheles sinensis at 3 development stages (larva, unfed adult and engorged adult).Twenty engorged adult An. sinensis mosquitoes were dissected, and bacteria were isolated from their midguts by plate cultivation. The bacteria were identified by using 16S rDNA V3 sequence and dyed with Gram-reaction solutions. Using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), 16S rDNA clone libraries from common bacteria in the midguts of lab-reared An. sinensis at 3 development stages (20 engorged adults, 10 larva and 50 unfed adults) were constructed. Target Gram-negative bacteria were screened by phylogenetic analysis of all 16S rDNA V3 sequences.In engorged adult female An. sinensis, 16S rRNA sequencing placed the 28 screened bacterial colonies with their closest matches into 5 major groups. Except Gram-positive Brevibacillus sp., the other four, Aeromonas sp., Comamonas sp., Elizabethkingia sp., and A4 were Gram-negative. DGGE analysis showed that 4 distinct bands existed in 3 development stages of An. sinensis. 16S rDNA V3 segments revealed 5 species of bacteria which were Aeromonas sp., A4, Pseudomonas sp., Leucobacter sp., and one unclassified bacterium. Compared with 16S rDNA V3 region of Aeromonas sp. (GQ301543) and A4(FJ8701127), the matching 16S rDNA segments of midgut bacteria of engorged adults showed a nucleotide sequence similarity of 100%.Aeromonas sp. and A4 were the common midgut Gram-negative bacteria of An. sinensis at 3 development stages.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Intestines, RNA, Bacterial, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Anopheles, Gram-Negative Bacteria, Animals, Female, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Phylogeny

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!