
The system for classifying mechanical injuries of the eye can identify the status of an injured eye at the trauma room, but it has no prognostic value. The ocular trauma score (OTS) estimates the 6-month visual prognosis, but some of its variables require evaluation by an ophthalmologist. We identified the proportion of injured eyes without diseases that required assessment of an ophthalmologist during the initial evaluation in order to determine whether the OTS could be used by non-ophthalmologists at the trauma room.We evaluated patients with ocular trauma who attended a general hospital in Mexico City between 1995 and 2008 and graded them with the system for classifying mechanical injuries of the eye. The rate of eyes with retinal detachment and endophthalmitis that needed evaluation by an ophthalmologist was identified, and all the eyes were assigned an OTS category. The proportion and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of eyes that could be graded using the OTS in a trauma room was determined.We evaluated 742 eyes. Retinal detachment was found in six eyes (0.8%, 95% CI 0.16-1.44) and endophthalmitis in two eyes (0.3%, 95% CI 0-0.69). The proportion of eyes that could be graded using the OTS in a trauma room was 98.9% (95% CI 98.15-99.65).OTS can be used to estimate the visual prognosis of almost every injured eye during the initial evaluation in a trauma room without the evaluation of an ophthalmologist.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Adolescent, Middle Aged, Young Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Eye Injuries, Injury Severity Score, Child, Preschool, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Child, Aged, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Adolescent, Middle Aged, Young Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Eye Injuries, Injury Severity Score, Child, Preschool, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Child, Aged, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
