
The study was carried out on color guinea pigs, in which anaphylactic shock was induced by sensitizing and challenging doses of normal horse serum (HS). Administration of atropine, ipratropium, or ipratropium in combination with neostigmine led to reduction of sensitizing effect of HS: anaphylactic index was decreased up to (2.2 - 2.4) +/- 0.1 arbitrary units (a.u.). Methacine in combination with neostigmine (0.4 +/- 0.01 a.u.) or atropine in combination with galantamine (1.5 +/- 0.3 a.u.) effectively prevented the pathochemical stage of anaphylactic shock. Changes in plasma protein concentrations modified effects of methacine: application of methacine with IgG was protective (0.5 +/- 0.1 a.u.), while CRP abolish the antianaphylactic activity of methacine (3.8 +/- 0.1 a.u.). Guinea pigs which survived shock had a great number of AFC [(880 +/- 22) x 10(6) splenocytes in experimental group and (100 +/- 29) x 10(6) in control) and low concentration of 5-HT in the spleen (at a shock, 0.443 +/- 0.005; basal level, 1.532 +/- 0.004 ng/mg protein). Effective prevention of anaphylactic shock resulted in normalization of B cell activity and 5-HT level in the spleen. Thus, cholinergic drugs modulate the immunological and pathochemical stages of anaphylactic shock.
Male, Serotonin, Guinea Pigs, Blood Proteins, Muscarinic Antagonists, Animals, Drug Therapy, Combination, Cholinesterase Inhibitors, Lymphocytes, Anaphylaxis, Spleen
Male, Serotonin, Guinea Pigs, Blood Proteins, Muscarinic Antagonists, Animals, Drug Therapy, Combination, Cholinesterase Inhibitors, Lymphocytes, Anaphylaxis, Spleen
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
