Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Experience with the intraoperative frozen section technique for stereotaxic brain tumor biopsies.

Authors: S, Patt; K, Weigel; C, Zimmer; C, Schreiner;

Experience with the intraoperative frozen section technique for stereotaxic brain tumor biopsies.

Abstract

The smear preparation technique is usually employed intraoperatively for stereotaxic brain tumor biopsies, whereas the frozen section technique is used in conventional operations, where larger tissue specimens can be obtained. 130 brain tumor biopsies were processed with the frozen section technique and postoperatively submitted to immunohistochemical examination. Subsequent paraffin embedding was not performed. In our study, frozen section diagnosis corresponded in 84% with the immunohistochemistry. Broggi et al. (1984) and Kleihues et al. (1984) demonstrated a similar positive correlation between intraoperative smear preparations and postoperative paraffin embedding. In our investigation, the greatest difficulties arose in cases of suspected lymphoma. Postoperatively, all lymphomas could be immunohistochemically clarified. Due to insufficient material 8% of the cases remained unclarified. Compared to smear preparation, the intraoperative frozen section technique during intervention provided a more accurate assessment of the histology. Furthermore the time needed for the procedure is not much longer than for smear preparation techniques. Reliable antibodies can be used in the remaining frozen material for further differentiation.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Intraoperative Period, Lymphoma, Brain Neoplasms, Biopsy, Frozen Sections, Humans, Glioma, Immunohistochemistry

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!