Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Analysis of the treatment failures for intertrochanteric fractures with dynamic hip screw (DHS)].

Authors: Zhong, Zhou; Jin, Xiong; Ning, Jiang; Lin, Xie; Hai-Tao, Huang; Yongfei, Tao;

[Analysis of the treatment failures for intertrochanteric fractures with dynamic hip screw (DHS)].

Abstract

To analyze the reasons and related factors of failures in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture with dynamic hip screw (DHS) and to increase the therapeutic level of intertrochanteric fracture.All the 78 cases of intertrochanteric fractures were treated with dynamic hip screws from Dec. 1998 to Dec. 2007 included 42 males and 36 females with an average age of 62 years old ranging from 26 to 85 years. The disease course was from 1 to 49 hours (means 4 hours). According to Evans-Jensen classification of intertrochanteric fracture, 4 cases were type IA, 24 cases were type IB, 13 cases were type IIA, 22 cases were type IIB, 11 cases were type III, 4 cases were type IV. The fracture were fixed with dynamic hip screws following AO operative standard. To analyze the reasons and related factors of the 12 failed cases involving femur head and neck cut-off, tail pin exit, coxa vara, screw loosening, compress screw slip out of the tube, fracture displacement, respectively.All the cases were followed up for 13 months to 7 years with an average of 36 months, 12 cases were failed including 4 cases of femur head and neck cut-off, 1 case of coax vara, 2 cases of compress screw slip out of the plate tube, 2 cases of screws loosening, 2 cases of tail pin displacement 1 case of great trochanter fracture displacement.For intertrochanteric fracture, to interfix with dynamic hip screw is an effective method, the choice of indication, the type of fracture, the bone mineral density and the manipulative technique affect the results.

Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Hip Fractures, Bone Screws, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome, Cluster Analysis, Humans, Female, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!