Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Surgical stabilization of thoracic wall fractures].

Authors: M, Quell; V, Vécsei;

[Surgical stabilization of thoracic wall fractures].

Abstract

We report our experience with 12 patients whose chest wall injuries were treated with stable internal fixation by means of rib plates. Of all patients with chest wall injuries requiring inpatient treatment, only 5.19% were operated for this diagnosis; that is to say this operation is seldom indicated. In 5 patients stabilization was done "on the retreat" when thoracotomy had to be performed for intrathoracic injury anyway; in another 5 patients inadequate recovery from respiratory insufficiency following conservative treatment led to the operation, and in 2 patients extreme dislocation of chest wall fractures with restricted chest volume was the reason for surgical intervention. The mean age of these patients was 58 years, the mean PTS score 28.5 (ranging from 18 to 56), mean duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation 6 days (median 5 days), mean duration of stay in the intensive care unit 18 days, and duration of stay in hospital was 42 days, reflecting the severity of associated trauma. The stability achieved in the chest wall permitted sufficiently painfree spontaneous ventilation 1-5 days after the operation in 50% of patients. Two aged patients died of non-trauma-related myocardial infarction and myocardial insufficiency, respectively, while in hospital. Complications attributable to the specific surgical intervention were superficial infection of the incision (2 cases) and postoperative haemorrhage from an intercostal artery (1 case). No late complications related to the specific operative procedure occurred.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Rib Fractures, Thoracic Injuries, Multiple Trauma, Middle Aged, Wounds, Nonpenetrating, Fracture Fixation, Internal, Humans, Female, Bone Plates, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!