
A continuing nationwide susceptibility survey of the Bacteroides fragilis group, begun in 1981, is being conducted at the New England Medical Center. Review of susceptibility testing in years 1986 through 1988 is reported here. Totals of 557 strains in 1986, 506 in 1987, and 534 in 1988 were obtained from seven centers in the United States. The most active beta-lactam drugs were beta-lactamase-inhibitor combinations ticarcillin-clavulanic acid, ampicillin-sulbactam, cefoperazone-sulbactam and the carbapenem imipenem. These drugs had virtually no resistance detected. Their rank order of activity was imipenem, ampicillin-sulbactam, ticarcillin-clavulanic acid, and cefoperazone-sulbactam, all with activity levels greater than cefoxitin or piperacillin, which, in turn, had activity levels greater than moxalactam, ceftizoxime, cefotetan, cefotaxime, cefoperazone, and ceftazidime. No metronidazole- or chloramphenicol-resistant isolates were found. Clindamycin resistance averaged 6% over the 3 years of testing. Ticarcillin-clavulanic acid, ampicillin-sulbactam, imipenem, and the non-beta-lactam drugs displayed uniform excellent activity against the five species of the B. fragilis group tested. The other beta-lactams displayed significant variability of activity among the various species.
Bacteroides fragilis, Humans, Drug Resistance, Microbial, Drug Therapy, Combination, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, beta-Lactams, Anti-Bacterial Agents
Bacteroides fragilis, Humans, Drug Resistance, Microbial, Drug Therapy, Combination, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, beta-Lactams, Anti-Bacterial Agents
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
