Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Newer beta-lactam agents and the Bacteroides fragilis group.

Authors: G J, Cuchural;

Newer beta-lactam agents and the Bacteroides fragilis group.

Abstract

A continuing nationwide susceptibility survey of the Bacteroides fragilis group, begun in 1981, is being conducted at the New England Medical Center. Review of susceptibility testing in years 1986 through 1988 is reported here. Totals of 557 strains in 1986, 506 in 1987, and 534 in 1988 were obtained from seven centers in the United States. The most active beta-lactam drugs were beta-lactamase-inhibitor combinations ticarcillin-clavulanic acid, ampicillin-sulbactam, cefoperazone-sulbactam and the carbapenem imipenem. These drugs had virtually no resistance detected. Their rank order of activity was imipenem, ampicillin-sulbactam, ticarcillin-clavulanic acid, and cefoperazone-sulbactam, all with activity levels greater than cefoxitin or piperacillin, which, in turn, had activity levels greater than moxalactam, ceftizoxime, cefotetan, cefotaxime, cefoperazone, and ceftazidime. No metronidazole- or chloramphenicol-resistant isolates were found. Clindamycin resistance averaged 6% over the 3 years of testing. Ticarcillin-clavulanic acid, ampicillin-sulbactam, imipenem, and the non-beta-lactam drugs displayed uniform excellent activity against the five species of the B. fragilis group tested. The other beta-lactams displayed significant variability of activity among the various species.

Keywords

Bacteroides fragilis, Humans, Drug Resistance, Microbial, Drug Therapy, Combination, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, beta-Lactams, Anti-Bacterial Agents

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!