Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Perception of chassis leakage current.

Authors: M, Levin;

Perception of chassis leakage current.

Abstract

The issue of chassis leakage currents flowing through areas on the surfaces of patients' bodies is again being discussed, probably because of increasing acceptance of International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) Standard 601-1, the use of more instruments with computational capability but with generally higher chassis leakage currents at the bedside, the absence of evidence that the 500-microampere chassis current limitation of IEC 601-1 has been harmful, and the lack of data to substantiate the lower limit currently applied in the United States. Reported relevant experiments have not attempted to duplicate the conditions existing for the situations of concern--an open ground, a person touching the chassis of the device that has an open ground condition, and this person then touching the patient; or a grounded patient touching an ungrounded chassis. In terms of perception of current, the patient touching an ungrounded chassis and being grounded would generally be the more sensitive, since the conductive path of just one person, the patient, is involved. A small test was conducted that simulated a person touching a chassis with an open ground wire and then touching a patient. The results did not confirm previous findings in another study that currents ranging from 261 to 500 microamperes caused pain. They were closer to those of a study of perception of 60-Hz current, in which similar currents elicited only perception.

Keywords

Electric Injuries, Male, Equipment and Supplies, Electric Conductivity, Sensation, Humans, Equipment Failure, Female

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!