Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Authors: Cheema, I A; Manecksha, R P; Flynn, R;

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Abstract

We report our results and short term follow up of transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction (PUJ) obstruction. We have prospectively maintained a database to document our initial experience of 54 laparoscopic pyeloplasty. All procedures were carried out by one surgeon through a transperitoneal approach. The data extends from April 2005 to September 2008 and reports operative time, blood loss, complications, hospital stay, short term follow-up on symptomatic and radiological outcome. Fifty-four procedures were performed during the study period. Mean patient age was 29 years. Mean operating time was 133 minutes (range 65-300 minutes), and mean blood loss was 45 ml (range 20-300 ml). No intra operative complication occurred. Neither blood transfusion nor conversion to open surgery was required. Postoperative mean hospital stay was 3.4 days (range 3-14 days). There were 3 anastomotic leakages; 2 in the immediate postoperative period and 1 following removal of stent. They all required percutaneous drainage and prolonged stenting. Overall 47 (87%) patients have symptomatic relief and resolution of obstruction on renogram. Four (7%) patients developed recurrence. Three (5.5%) patients had symptomatic relief but have a persistent obstructive renogram. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty is an effective alternative treatment for symptomatic pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction. The results appear comparable to open pyeloplasty with decreased postoperative morbidity.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Adolescent, Length of Stay, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Treatment Outcome, Recurrence, Humans, Urologic Surgical Procedures, Female, Laparoscopy, Stents, Retrospective Studies, Ureteral Obstruction

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!