Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

A total ban on workplace smoking is acceptable and effective.

Authors: B, Hocking; R, Borland; N, Owen; G, Kemp;

A total ban on workplace smoking is acceptable and effective.

Abstract

The acceptability and effectiveness of a total workplace smoking ban in Telecom Australia was evaluated in a series of studies. Staff in a sample of representative areas were surveyed prior to the introduction of the bans, then 6 and 18 months afterward. By 18 months 81% of all staff, including 53% of smokers, approved of the bans. Sixty-six percent of staff reported a total ban was operative, and 31% reported a total ban except for a smoking room, leaving only 3% reporting lesser restrictions. Smokers were smoking between three and four less cigarettes per work day, and the numbers of smokers had decreased by about double the community rate. The policy had little perceived effect on productivity but resulted in some tension between staff that progressively decreased and now is limited to the few areas where there were problems with compliance. A subsample of managers and staff were interviewed and factors relevant to successful implementation of the policy were identified. These included a clear statement of policy, strong managerial support via equipping managers with leadership and negotiating skills, and the use of occupational health nurses. It is important to provide assistance to affected staff to help them adjust to the ban both before as well as in the months after implementation.

Keywords

Adult, Lung Diseases, Male, Occupational Diseases, Humans, Female, Smoking Prevention, Tobacco Smoke Pollution, Air Pollutants, Occupational, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    24
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
24
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!