Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Limbal-conjunctival autograft in pterygium surgery].

Authors: G, Mery; T, Maalouf; J-L, George; K, Angioi;

[Limbal-conjunctival autograft in pterygium surgery].

Abstract

The aim of this study was to estimate the efficacy of limbal-conjunctival autograft in the treatment of pterygium.We conducted a retrospective study including 15 patients (16 eyes) operated on for pterygium by limbal-conjunctival autograft. The examination included the search for risk factors and visual acuity, as well as corneal astigmatism and pterygium measurement. The follow-up included an examination at day 8, 1 month, and 3 months and assessed the integration of the transplant on the eye's surface, the aesthetic aspect, and recurrence. We describe the patients' characteristics, visual acuity, and astigmatism before and after surgery.The mean age of the patients was 56 years (range, 31-81 years). Before surgery, irritative signs and astigmatism, were found in 37% and impaired visual acuity in 81%. The mean duration of the follow-up after surgery was 19 months. Visual acuity and astigmatism improved in 56% of our patients. All transplants and harvest sites had a satisfactory macroscopic aspect. However, one patient suffered from a corneal invasion by fibrovascular tissue, 7 months postoperatively, which remained stable at the end of follow-up.In our study, the limbal-conjunctival autograft was a safe and effective surgical treatment with a very low recurrence rate at long-term follow-up.

Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Astigmatism, Limbus Corneae, Middle Aged, Pterygium, Fibrosis, Transplantation, Autologous, Causality, Corneal Transplantation, Treatment Outcome, Recurrence, Humans, Corneal Neovascularization, Female, Safety, Conjunctiva, Aged, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    10
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
10
Average
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!