
handle: 20.500.14776/1817
This causal comparative study was designed to investigate students' mathematical problem solving achievement and attributions for success and failure in mathematics by gender. Sixty-two third grade students completed a mathematics problem solving test. There were no significant differences in mathematical problem solving achievement by gender. The students' perceptions of the causes of their performance in mathematics were measured using the Mathematics Attribution Scale (MAS). The students rated the strength of each attribute as an explanation for failure and success events. There were no significant differences for failure events by gender. A statistical significance between gender and attributions for success was discovered. Males attributed their success in mathematics to ability significantly more than females. Paper copy at Leddy Library: Theses & Major Papers - Basement, West Bldg. / Call Number: Thesis2002 .F37. Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 41-04, page: 0899. Adviser: Linda McKay. Thesis (M.Ed.)--University of Windsor (Canada), 2002.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
