Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao IRIS Cnrarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
IRIS Cnr
Other literature type . 2016
Data sources: IRIS Cnr
CNR ExploRA
Article . 2016
Data sources: CNR ExploRA
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Exposure to airborne biological agents in a conventional laboratory animal facility

Authors: Chiomento A; Marcelloni AM; Riviello MC; Paba E; Sisto R; D'Ovidio MC; Wirz A;

Exposure to airborne biological agents in a conventional laboratory animal facility

Abstract

Working with laboratory animals (LA) may expose personnel to a complex mixtures containing, besides the well known allergens, microorganisms and their components that can lead to adverse health effects. This paper reports the results of a microbiological environmental monitoring carried out in a conventional laboratory facility housing about 7,000 animals including mice and rats. The primary objective was to measure and characterize airborne fungi, bacteria, endotoxins, and (1/3)-b-D-glucans through air sampling with the aim to determine which factors or working tasks were associated with the greatest level of exposure to biological agents. Bioaerosols were collected from seven animal rooms, a storage area, two washing rooms and some offices. In animal rooms air samples were taken over three consecutive days: the day in which the cages are changed, the day before and the day after changing cages. Mesophilic bacteria levels ranged from 2.5 to 885 CFU/m3, with the detection, during the change of cages, of Gram-negative bacteria belonging to risk group 2 (Escherichia coli, Enterobacter cloacae), while moulds and yeasts levels ranged from 0 to 335 CFU/m3. Mean concentrations of endotoxins and (1/3)-b-D-glucans were below the exposure limits in all workplaces except the storage area, where values respectively of 210.7 CFU/m3 and 5,145 pg/m3 were recorded during the preparation of litter and distribution of feed. The one-way ANOVA test showed a statistically significant increase (p-value <0.05) of all microbiological parameters during the change of cages. Our results identified the working phases carried out in animal rooms and in the storage area as the more "critical" with regard to the potential exposure to biological agents. The data suggest that rodent bedding could be a source of accumulation and release of endotoxins and fungal components. Further investigation is needed to estimate the personal exposure in order to implement proper control and prevention measures.

Country
Italy
Keywords

animali da laboratorio, Rischio occupazionale, Allergia animali da laboratorio

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!