
handle: 20.500.14243/251635 , 11587/363921
Macrobenthic samples were collected in 4 sites inside the Acquatina lake (3 replicates for each site in two times: July 2006 and January 2007). A total of 5029 individuals belonging to 50 taxa were found, with molluscs taxonomically dominant (26 taxa), followed by polychaetes (19 taxa), which was instead numerically dominant due to the massive presence of the species Heteromastus filiformis. Data were analysed by multivariate techniques. The assemblage was quite homogeneous within the lake, with more quantitative than qualitative differences among sites. Statistical analysis showed two sites, representing the two extreme of the biotope condition, as the most variable ones and separated from the others, located in the middle of the investigated biotope. The separation of the two sites from this central more homogeneous area was due to a different distribution between molluscs and polychaetes species. The comparison of the polychaete distribution between data relative to a previous period of study and present ones revealed a more diversified assemblage, with the disappearance of some opportunistic forms, and with an homogenization within the basin, underlining the disappearance of the strong salinity gradient.
570, 590
570, 590
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
