
handle: 20.500.12959/4489
La colecistectomía laparoscópica se ha convertido en un procedimiento de elección para la colelitiasis. La anestesia para este procedimiento debe cumplir con los siguientes requisitos: estabilidad hemodinámica ventilatoria, buena analgesia intraoperatoria y postoperatoria, adecuada relajación, rápida recuperación posanestésica, disminución de náuseas y vómitos. El presente trabajo considera estos requisitos para comparar la anestesia general con Isoflurane versus anestesia raquídea con bupivacaina fentanil. Se concluye que la hipotensión es mayor con la anestesia regional, pero que es manejable sólo con cristaloides o agregando alfa adrenérgicos. La estabilidad ventilatoria es mejor con la anestesia regional, que produce una buena analgesia con adecuada relajación del paciente, las náuseas postoperatorias son menores y la recuperación posanestésica es espectacular. La técnica es aplicable en cualquier lugar del Perú, con una trascendencia social para los pacientes con menos recursos ya que es de un costo muy reducido y ahorra al IPSS US $ 52.00 por operación, comparado con la anestesia general.
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the standard surgic procedure for cholelithiasis. Anesthesia required for this procedure must comply the following conditions hemodynamic and ventilatory stability, good intra- and post-operative analgesia, adervate relaxation, fast post-anesthesic recovery, lower incidence of nausea and vomit. This paper takes into consideration these above-mentioned conditions for comparison ofisoflurane general anesthesia and fentanyl-bupivacaine anesthesia. It is concluded that hypotension is more frequentin regional anesthesia and it can be managed with cristaloids alone or adding alpha-aprenergic drugs. Ventilatory stability gets better with regional anesthesia, that also gives good analgesia with adequate patient relaxation, less post- operative nausea and impressive post-anesthetic recovery. This technique is usable anywhere in Peru, and with social favoring for poor patients because of lower cost and real savings estimated to be US $ 52.00 per procedure as compared to general anesthesia.
Premio nivel B. Hospitales II y III. Clínica IPSS de Vitarte
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.09, Colecistectomía, Anestesia de conducción, Anestesia regional, Colecistectomía laparoscópica, Anestesia
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.09, Colecistectomía, Anestesia de conducción, Anestesia regional, Colecistectomía laparoscópica, Anestesia
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
