
handle: 20.500.12907/32609
This paper presents a comparative study of various methods of roughness quantification applied to rock fractures. The parameters which are discussed and used for comparing 7 types of rock and two failure mode are : arithmetic mean value, quadratic mean value (and standard deviation of peaks heights), JRC and estimations of the fractal dimension by the ruler method, the analogy to Koch curve, the variogram and the power spectral density analysis. Regarding the results obtained and the discussion about the accuracy of calculation, it is difficult to draw a firm conclusion to state the most convenient method for quantifying roughness or complexity of rock fractures because all the parameters could be significant depending on the aims of the quantification. Nevertheless, the statistical analysis of results allows to point 4 independent parameters which have significant meaning and variability for quantifying roughness or complexity of natural rock fractures.
Aérospatiale, astronomie & astrophysique, Physical, chemical, mathematical & earth Sciences, Physique, chimie, mathématiques & sciences de la terre, Earth sciences & physical geography, Space science, astronomy & astrophysics, Sciences de la terre & géographie physique
Aérospatiale, astronomie & astrophysique, Physical, chemical, mathematical & earth Sciences, Physique, chimie, mathématiques & sciences de la terre, Earth sciences & physical geography, Space science, astronomy & astrophysics, Sciences de la terre & géographie physique
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
