
handle: 20.500.12809/6019 , 20.500.12809/3088
This study was conducted to determine the parameters that affect a teacher's self-efficacy and discover which teacher efficacies are better in terms of characteristics. Four hundred sixty-seven teachers from different branches of study participated voluntarily. As a data-collection tool, the Teachers' Efficacy Scale was used. In the statistical analysis of the data obtained from the study, a One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, a Mann-Whitney U test and a Kruskal-Wallis H test were employed. To determine the relationship between the sub-dimensions, a Spearman correlation analysis was applied. As a result of this study, it has been identified that teaching-strategy scores differ significantly in terms of gender, age groups and educational status (p<0.05). A significant difference was found between teacher efficacy and recognition of students in terms of gender and educational status (p<0.05). It was observed that there is no significant difference between professional seniority and the teachers' branches of study in terms of these three sub-dimensions (p<0.05). Additionally, environmental factors did not differ in terms of any demographic variables (p<0.05). An important finding of this research is the linear relationship between the sub-dimensions (p<0.05). That is, a decrease in a feature of efficacy will reduce the other factors.
WOS: 000357544400023
Teacher's Role, Classroom environment, Teacher’s Role, Teaching Profession, Teaching profession, Teacher efficacy, Classroom Environment, Teaching and Learning Process, 420, Teacher Efficacy, Teaching and learning process
Teacher's Role, Classroom environment, Teacher’s Role, Teaching Profession, Teaching profession, Teacher efficacy, Classroom Environment, Teaching and Learning Process, 420, Teacher Efficacy, Teaching and learning process
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
