When dealing with liability based on fault, it is not difficult to determine who is the responsible entity. First and foremost, the one who committed the act is the perpetrator. In certain cases, the legal system diverges from the general principle of liability based on fault, therefore in such cases a particularly strict liability is prescribed by the law. This especially strict liability is called objective liability and has been instituted for cases when activities that are in themselves useful and permissible, but regardless of due diligence pose a high risk of damages and in the event of the realization of such risk, the injured party could obtain compensation in a simplified way. Liability imposed by law can only be acquitted in exceptional cases if the person proves that the damage was caused by force majeure, the conduct of the injured party or the conduct of a third party. The legal form of objective liability represents an exception in the system of noncontractual liability, so the purpose of my work was to present the institute of liability for the actions of another, and the goal was to find out what this means for both the injured party and the holder of such objective responsibility and to try to draw attention to areas of strict liability which so far have not been researched extensively. The following methods were used in writing this master's thesis: descriptive (explanatory) method, method of historical interpretation, analytical method, method of compilation and classification, synthetic method. For the most part, I have researched the institute of objective responsibility in various relationships under the Code of Obligations

Kadar imamo opravka s krivdno odgovornostjo, ni težko ugotoviti, kdo je odgovoren subjekt. V prvi vrsti je tisti, ki je dejanje storil, storilec. V določenih primerih pa pravo odstopa od splošnega načela o krivdni odgovornosti, zato v takih primerih zakon določa posebej strogo odgovornost. Ta posebej stroga odgovornost se imenuje objektivna odgovornost in je nastala zato, da bi v primerih dejavnosti, ki so same po sebi koristne in dopustne, a kljub skrbnosti predstavljajo veliko tveganje za nastanek škode, v primeru uresničitve tveganja oškodovanec lahko po poenostavljeni poti prišel do odškodnine. Z zakonom naložene odgovornosti se je mogoče razbremeniti le v izjemnih primerih, če oseba dokaže, da je škoda nastala zaradi višje sile, ravnanja oškodovanca ali ravnanja tretjega. Pravni institut objektivne odgovornosti predstavlja izjemo v sistemu nepogodbene odškodninske odgovornosti, zato je bil namen tega dela predstaviti institut odgovornosti za ravnanja drugega, cilj pa ugotoviti, kaj to pomeni tako za oškodovanca kot tudi za nosilca odgovornosti, in še poskusiti opozoriti na področja v zvezi z objektivno odgovornostjo, ki do zdaj še niso bila toliko raziskana. Pri pisanju magistrskega dela so bile uporabljene naslednje metode: deskriptivna (opisna) metoda, metoda zgodovinske razlage, analitična metoda, metoda kompilacije in klasifikacije, sintetična metoda. V pretežnem delu sem raziskovala institut objektivne odgovornosti v različnih razmerjih po Obligacijskem zakoniku.