Ehl-i hadith criticised very much Ebu Hanife when he lived and after his life. They claimed that Ebu Hanife wasn’t obey sunna and hadith in a lot lof questions and he disregarded them. But Ebu Hanife is representative of a tradition that it begins with Abdullah b. Mesud and continues with Alkame, Nehai and Hammad. He assessed and commented sunna and hadith in accordance with this tradition. However Ehl-i hadith had a religious approuch that relies on hadiths in belief, jurisprudance and ethic. They denied personal views when they had a hadith. In conclusion Ebu Hanife and Ehl-i hadith had got diffirent metodologies. Ebu Hanife’s methodology proffered caution about the hadiths when Ehl-i hadith’s methodology profferred trust in them.