Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Universidad Católica...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Repositorio Institucional USAT
Master thesis . 2024
License: CC BY
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

El procedimiento sancionador tributario administrativo y la vulneración del principio de culpabilidad

Authors: Salazar Rivera, Angie Violeta; Salazar Rivera, Angie Violeta;

El procedimiento sancionador tributario administrativo y la vulneración del principio de culpabilidad

Abstract

El Código Tributario vigente, que regula el fundamento de la potestad sancionadora en materia tributaria, está a disposición de la Administración Tributaria para su utilización en el ejercicio de acciones y ejecución de sanciones tributarias; en la instancia correspondiente ante un organismo de la administración fiscal, según sea el caso, el contribuyente puede hacer valer estos principios. Sin embargo, hay un principio el de culpabilidad, que no es recogido por la autoridad sancionadora en materia tributaria. Es aquí donde surge el desacuerdo ya que habría que evaluar la eficacia de la Administración Tributaria al momento de imponer sanciones o el derecho del ciudadano ya que está prohibido evaluar dicho principio en materia tributaria. Como objetivo general del presente estudio es resolver si el procedimiento sancionador tributario administrativo, vulnera al principio de culpabilidad. Para ello se realizará una investigación cualitativa en la cual se recoge datos no cuantificables basados en observaciones del comportamiento para su posterior interpretación. Concluyéndose que la responsabilidad objetiva solo reconoce que la SUNAT ejecute una precipitada tarea para poder sancionar al contribuyente que comete una infracción, en materia tributaria no existe un procedimiento especial estipulado en el Código Tributario y el artículo 165 tiene que incluir la responsabilidad subjetiva, ya viene a ser un límite a la facultad sancionadora del Estado.

The Tax Administration, in taking measures and executing tax sanctions, has the current Tax Code who controls the foundations of the sanctioning power in tax matters; In the corresponding instance before a tax administration body, as the case may be, the taxpayer can assert these principles. However, there is a principle of guilt, which is not included by the sanctioning authority in tax matters. This is where the disagreement arises since it would be necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of the Tax Administration when imposing sanctions or the right of the citizen since it is prohibited to evaluate said principle in tax matters. The general objective of this investigation is to determine if the administrative tax sanctioning procedure violates the principle of culpability. To do this, a qualitative investigation will be carried out in which non-quantifiable data is collected based on behavioral observations for subsequent interpretation. Concluding that objective responsibility only recognizes that SUNAT executes a quick task to be able to sanction the taxpayer who commits an infraction, in tax matters there is no special procedure stipulated in the Tax Code and article 165 has to include subjective responsibility, it is already coming to be a limit to the sanctioning power of the State.

Country
Peru
Keywords

http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.00, Principio de culpabilidad, 330, Sanción tributaria, Tax penalty, https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.00, Principle of culpability, Tax Administration, Administración tributaria

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green