Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Sivas Cumhuriyet Uni...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

An investigation of clothing purchase behaviours of digital consumers

Authors: Taydaş S.; Çoruh E.;

An investigation of clothing purchase behaviours of digital consumers

Abstract

The aim of the research was to investigate of clothing purchase behaviours of digital consumers. The survey method was employed in the research. A questionnaire was developed to gather the data. The questionnaire was designed in two parts. In the first part of the questionnaire it consisted of defining the personal details. In the second part, the advantages and disadvantages of purchasing clothes via the Internet were itemised with five-point Likert scale. The sample group was selected with “random sample method” as 512 digital consumers. In the research, the clothing purchase behaviours of the digital consumers were compared in terms of the advantages and disadvantages with the personal details. As a result, women thought the clothes purchasing from the Internet favourable and men thought that it was unfavourable. It was also seen that the users of the Internet for shopping older than 4-5 years and the users of the daily 4-5 hours shopping websites found the Internet favourable for the clothing purchase. For other comparisons, there wasn’t any meaningful relationship. 

Araştırmanın amacı dijital tüketicilerin giysi satın alma davranışlarını incelemektir. Araştırmada betimsel yöntem kullanılmıştır. Veri toplamak için bir anket geliştirilmiştir. Anket iki bölümden oluşmuştur. Anketin birinci bölümde kişisel özellikleri saptanmasına yönelik sorular sorulmuştur. İkinci bölümde ise; beşli Likert dereceleme ile internet üzerinden giysi satın almanın avantajları ve dezavantajları konusunda maddelere yer verilmiştir. Örneklem grubu olarak 512 dijital tüketici “tesadüfi örnekleme yöntemi” ile seçilmiştir. Araştırmada dijital tüketicilerin giysi satın alma davranışları kişisel özellikler ile avantajlar ve dezavantajlar açısından karşılaştırılmıştır. Sonuç olarak; kadınların internetten giysi alışverişini avantajlı buldukları, erkeklerin ise dezavantajlı buldukları, interneti 4-5 yıl arasında alışveriş amaçlı kullananların ve günlük 4-5 saat arasında alışveriş sitelerini kullananların avantajlı buldukları görülmüştür. Bu sonuçların dışındaki diğer karşılaştırmalarda anlamlı ilişki saptanmamıştır.

Country
Turkey
Related Organizations
Keywords

Clothing purchase, Digital consumer, Clothing;Clothing Purchase;Purchase Behaviour;Consumer;Digital Consumer., Mühendislik, 303, Giysi;Giysi Satın Alma;Satın Alma Davranışı;Tüketici;Dijital Tüketici., Consumer, Clothing, Engineering, Purchase behaviour

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green