
handle: 20.500.11769/8482
In literature it is common to think about segregation as the outcome of a stochastic allocation process, characterized by the preferences and the constraints of both the individuals and the allocation units. In this perspective, several authors have already documented, using simulations, that the observed value of the Duncan & Duncan dissimilarity index is an upward biased estimator of the true population counterpart. In this paper, following a multinomial framework, we provide a mathematical proof of the nonnegativity of this bias.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
