
Because the usual linear model does not convey information pertinent to the randomization process, the linear model and associated expected mean squares are inadequate when randomization is restricted in some way. The linear model is extended to incorporate such information by viewing the realized observations as a fraction of the potential observations, and utilizing the idea of bias or aliasing in a manner similar to fractional designs. In particular, two areas of restricted randomization are examined (1) restricting the run-order of a sequential experiment and (2) restrictions resulting from inherent structure of the experimental material (blocking). In both cases treatment effects and effects associated with the randomization process may be non-additive, in contrast to some of the previous work that has assumed such effects are additive. In addition, the nature of the resulting bias is examined. Rules are specified that allow construction of pseudo expected mean squares that indicate the presence of bias that results from restricting the randomization process.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
