
One hundred twelve specimens from bovine incisors were divided into eight groups: Group 1 (treated with 10% strontium chloride gel), Group 2 (treated with 2% sodium fluoride gel), Group 3 (treated with 2% stannous fluoride gel), Group 4 (treated with 5% potassium nitrate gel), Group 5 (treated with 10% potassium nitrate gel), Group 6 (treated with 3% potassium oxalate gel), Group 7 (treated with hydroxyethylcellulose gel), and Group 8 (which received no treatment). Dentinal tubules were exposed after 0.5 mm of deep abrasion using a carbide bur and EDTA gel application. After each treatment, dentin permeability, tubule occlusion, and chemical elements on dentin were analyzed. There was a significant difference among groups in dentin permeability (p < 0.05 ANOVA). Groups 4, 5, and 6 showed the lowest values, while Groups 1, 7, and 8 exhibited the highest. Groups 1, 2, 3, 7, and 8 showed open dentinal tubules, Groups 4 and 5 had partial tubule occlusion, and most of the tubules in Group 6 were obliterated. Energy-dispersive x-rays revealed similar chemical characteristics among the experimental agents used, with traces of strontium, fluoride, sodium, and potassium. Within the limits of the study, 3% potassium oxalate gel showed the best results in terms of dentin permeability and dentinal tubule occlusion.
Oxalates, Silver Staining, Nitrates, Dentin Desensitizing Agents, Potassium Compounds, Dentin Permeability, Tooth Abrasion, Strontium, Smear Layer, Dentin, Materials Testing, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Tin Fluorides, Animals, Sodium Fluoride, Cattle, Cellulose, Edetic Acid, Chelating Agents, Electron Probe Microanalysis
Oxalates, Silver Staining, Nitrates, Dentin Desensitizing Agents, Potassium Compounds, Dentin Permeability, Tooth Abrasion, Strontium, Smear Layer, Dentin, Materials Testing, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Tin Fluorides, Animals, Sodium Fluoride, Cattle, Cellulose, Edetic Acid, Chelating Agents, Electron Probe Microanalysis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
