
A 0.9 train-of-four ratio, measured at the thumb, is currently considered to reflect adequate recovery of neuromuscular block. Recent studies have documented that a train-of-four ratio <0.9 is associated with a decrease in chemoreceptor sensitivity to hypoxia and with a functional impairment of the pharyngeal muscles. These residual effects of neuromuscular blocking agents promote insufficient ventilatory response to hypoxia and regurgitation/aspiration. As a result, the incidence of pulmonary complications have been found to be higher in both early and late postoperative period in patients with residual curarisation. Clinical tests such as the head lift test and visual or tactile evaluation of the response to peripheral nerve stimulation are no longer sufficient to exclude postoperative residual curarisation. Residual curarisation is still present at the time of extubation despite the use of subject if monitoring of neuromuscular function, clinical tests and/or reversal of neuromuscular blocking agents. In contrast, acceleromyographic monitoring provides a valuable tool to avoid residual curarisation and to reduce the related-side effects.
Carotid Body, Cyclodextrins, Electrodiagnosis, Incidence, Respiratory Paralysis, Sensitivity and Specificity, Respiratory Muscles, Postoperative Complications, Anesthesia Recovery Period, Intubation, Intratracheal, Neuromuscular Blockade, Pharyngeal Muscles, Humans, Hypoxia, Device Removal, Monitoring, Physiologic, Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents
Carotid Body, Cyclodextrins, Electrodiagnosis, Incidence, Respiratory Paralysis, Sensitivity and Specificity, Respiratory Muscles, Postoperative Complications, Anesthesia Recovery Period, Intubation, Intratracheal, Neuromuscular Blockade, Pharyngeal Muscles, Humans, Hypoxia, Device Removal, Monitoring, Physiologic, Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 21 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
