
In many areas, GTN have become a success story in the field of oncology. It is well known that pregnancies with hydatidiform moles are high risk and carry the potential for the development of malignant forms of GTN. Monitoring with hCG levels has become accepted as the model for a sensitive and specific serum tumor marker. Chemotherapeutic strategies are well documented and are usually successful. However, as the recent literature demonstrates, further basic and clinical research is needed to define the epidemiology of GTN, especially choriocarcinoma resulting from nonmolar gestations. Identification of high-risk patients after evacuation of hydatidiform mole, perhaps using newer hCG subunit assays, might prevent postmolar GTN by identifying patients who would benefit from prophylactic chemotherapy. Because of the high cure rates for nonmetastatic and low-risk metastatic GTN, further research is needed to define cost-effective and efficacious regimens with low toxicity. A uniform system for staging and assessing risk of patients with GTN should be adopted and used by all investigators reporting results of chemotherapy. Although the World Health Organization system is the most widely used prognostic scoring system, further study with large numbers of patients is necessary to validate the weighted scores assigned to each item in the scoring system. Finally, collaborative groups should conduct randomized prospective studies to evaluate newer regimens for high-risk GTN and to develop salvage regimens using rigorously controlled phase II studies.
Trophoblastic Neoplasms, Prognosis, Chorionic Gonadotropin, Severity of Illness Index, Survival Rate, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Humans, Female, Monitoring, Physiologic
Trophoblastic Neoplasms, Prognosis, Chorionic Gonadotropin, Severity of Illness Index, Survival Rate, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Humans, Female, Monitoring, Physiologic
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
