Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

[The value of imaging methods in diagnosis of submandibular gland diseases].

Authors: Min-Wen, Zhu; Chuang-Qi, Yu; Wei-Jie, Zhang; Ling-Yan, Zheng; Min-Jie, Chen;

[The value of imaging methods in diagnosis of submandibular gland diseases].

Abstract

To retrospectively analyze the advantages and disadvantages of imaging methods commonly used for diagnosis of gland submandibular diseases.One hundred and eighty-two patients with submandibular gland surgery were retrospectively studied to compare the accuracy rate between preoperative imaging and postoperative diagnosis.The data were analyzed using SAS8.0 software package.Fisher's exact test was used to compare the difference between B type ultrasonography, CT and MRI.Compared with postoperative pathological results,diagnostic accuracy rate of B type ultrasonography, CT and X-ray was 85.34%, 79.66% and 92.31%, respectively. MRI had a higher accuracy rate than B type ultrasonography or CT.(P<0.05).B type ultrasonography, CT and X-ray examination have misdiagnosis especially in submandibular sialadenitis,which is one of the most important causes of misdiagnosis leading to excision of the glands.MRI has higher application value in diagnosis of submandibular gland diseases.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Submandibular Gland, Submandibular Gland Diseases, Humans, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Sialadenitis, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!