Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[The infected sternotomy].

Authors: D, Montandon;

[The infected sternotomy].

Abstract

In the presence of a wound infection following a sternotomy, an active surgical treatment is currently the method of choice. Large debridement followed by an effective wound closure is advised by most authors. In our experience, most cases will respond to this treatment whateither flap is used: omentum, rectus abdominis, latissimus dorsi, pectoralis major musculocutaneous flaps. However, a few patients have had repeated attempt to close the sternal defect without success. In these cases a proper surgical treatment is a life-saving procedure. Thorough debridement and closure with bipedicled pectoralis major and rectus fascio-cutaneous flaps with drainage of the mediastinum is advised. Stabilisation of thoracic wall and filling of the dead space are not mandatory.

Keywords

Reoperation, Sternum, Debridement, Humans, Surgical Wound Infection, Coronary Artery Bypass, Middle Aged, Surgical Flaps, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!