Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Suburethral sling procedures for stress urinary incontinence].

Authors: F, Sergent; G, Gay-Crosier; L, Marpeau;

[Suburethral sling procedures for stress urinary incontinence].

Abstract

The rational of the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence has changed over the past few years. The techniques of colposuspension have been replaced by the suburethral slings, retropubic initially with the TVT, recreating a backboard between the urethra and the vaginal anterior wall. Nevertheless with overall cure rates of 69% to 88%, in periods beyond 5 years, the colposuspension still remains the reference (high-grade scientific evidence). Based on observational studies (low quality scientific evidence), with generally a short follow-up, the results of the TVT appear similar. More recently, the suburethral transobturator tape (TOT) was introduced to reduce the complications of the TVT. It is thus difficult to currently have an objective idea of the effectiveness of the TOT compared to the TVT, even if the first impressions, with respect to the TOT, are rather favourable. Furthermore the TOT technique itself and the biomaterials used, have continued to evolve. In fact, if the complications of these two kinds of suburethral slings are different: bladder perforation for the TVT, prosthetic erosion for the TOT, in contrast, in the future, their indications could be different. Therefore the TVT appears more effective in presence of intrinsic sphincter deficiency with urethral hypermobility.

Keywords

Prosthesis Implantation, Suburethral Slings, Treatment Outcome, Urinary Incontinence, Stress, Humans, Female, Equipment Design, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    11
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
11
Average
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!