Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Utility of the determination of the foetal fibronectina in pregnancies of 40 weeks or more to predict the beginning of labor].

Authors: Mónica, García González; Rafael, Rodríguez Ledesma; Mauricio, Gutiérrez Castañeda; Mauricio, Fernández Romero; Arturo, Casas Godoy; Blanca, Padilla García;

[Utility of the determination of the foetal fibronectina in pregnancies of 40 weeks or more to predict the beginning of labor].

Abstract

Perinatal morbidity and mortality increase in proportion to the time from waited date of labor to birth. A test helping to predict pregnancies is required, which also helps to predict pregnancies that will progress more than 41 weeks.To determine the usefulness of fetal fibronectin in vaginal secretions to predict pregnancies that will progress 41 weeks or more.A cohort and descriptive study was done in which 144 women with a pregnancy of 40 weeks or more were included. Fetal fibronectin was detected in cervix-vaginal secretions and time from the sample obtaining to birth was estimated.Seventy patients with positive fibronectin were recorded; 92% had labor in the following seven days from the sample obtaining (interval mean: 3.1 days). The remaining patients (n = 44) resulted with negative fibronectin; only 37.5% had spontaneous labor, but none of them during the first four days from the sample obtaining (mean: 7.9 days).Absence of fetal fibronectin in vaginal secretions is a good prognostic marker to identify patients who will achieve a pregnancy of 41 weeks or more (sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 84%; positive and negative predictive value of 75% and 80.7%, respectively, and relative risk of 10, CI 95%, 5.7-14.3). This method is useful to prevent perinatal complications inherent to the pregnancy of 41 weeks or more.

Keywords

Adult, Pregnancy Trimester, Third, Fibronectins, Cohort Studies, Fetus, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Cervix Mucus, Humans, Labor Onset, Female

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!