Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Efficacy and safety of low-energy QS Nd:YAG and QS alexandrite laser for melasma].

Authors: Hong-Wei, Wang; Ke-Ying, Liu;

[Efficacy and safety of low-energy QS Nd:YAG and QS alexandrite laser for melasma].

Abstract

To assess the efficacy and safety of low-energy QS Nd : YAG and QS alexandrite laser for melsasma.We treated 32 patients with melasma using the low-energy QS Nd : YAG and QS alexandrite laser. Pigment subsided by > or = 90% was regarded as "cured", by 60% -89% as "remarkably improved", by 30% -59% as "effective", and by < 30% as "ineffective" .Among the 32 patients, 21 patients (65.6%) were cured after (10.2 +/- 3.5) times (range: 4-15 times) of treatments, 11 patients (34.4%) were remarkably improved after (11.4 +/- 2.5) times (range: 10-14 times) of treatment. The rates of "cured" and "remarkably improved" were 81.3% and 18.7% among patients with light brown melasma and 50.0% and 50.0% among patients with dark brown melasma (P < 0.05). In patients with a disease history of less than 2 years, the rates of " cured" and "remarkably improved" were 87.5% and 12.5%, which was significantly better than the treatment results of patients with a disease history of more than 2 years (the rates of "cured" and "remarkably improved" were 58.3% and 41.7%) (P < 0.05). No hyperpigment and scarring was observed and only one patient experienced a transient pigment loss.Lower-energy QS Nd : YAG and QS Alexandrite Laser can be used to treat patients with melasma safely and effectively. The color and disease course of melasma were factors that may affect the treatment results.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Treatment Outcome, Humans, Female, Lasers, Solid-State, Low-Level Light Therapy, Middle Aged, Risk Assessment, Melanosis

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!