Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

The utility of direct agglutination (DAT) and fast agglutination screening (FAST) tests in serodiagnosis of experimental microsporidiosis.

Authors: Iman F, Abou El Naga; Maha R, Gaafar; Lobna A, El-Zawawy; Doaa, El-Said; Sherin F, Mossallam;

The utility of direct agglutination (DAT) and fast agglutination screening (FAST) tests in serodiagnosis of experimental microsporidiosis.

Abstract

The present study was designed to evaluate the efficiency of two serodiagnostic tests; the direct agglutination test (DAT) and the fast agglutination screening test (FAST) in the diagnosis of Microsporidia in experimentally infected mice and to differentiate between different species of the parasite. The swiss albino mice were divided into non infected control and infected experimental groups which were further subdivided into ten subgroups. Ten samples of microsporidial spores were isolated from ten human stools and each one was used to infect each subgroup of mice. Stool and sera were collected weekly from each subgroup from the 1st to the 4th week post infection (PI). DAT & FAST tests, using antigen prepared from the different species of microsporidial spores were used to detect antibodies in sera of different mice subgroups. The cross reactivity of microsporidial spores with the antibodies of Cyclospora cyatenensis and Cryptosporidium parvum was investigated by DAT & FAST. The results proved that DAT & FAST were effective in detecting microsporidial antibodies in sera of experimentally infected mice from the 2nd week PI till the end of the study, without cross reactivity with C. cyatenensis or C. parvum. They failed to differentiate between different Microspoiridia species used but, they gave good interpretation and they were specific and sensitive, and did not need sophisticated equipments.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Cross Reactions, Spores, Fungal, Sensitivity and Specificity, Mice, Random Allocation, Species Specificity, Agglutination Tests, Microsporidia, Microsporidiosis, Animals, Humans, Antibodies, Fungal

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!