
The present study was designed to evaluate the efficiency of two serodiagnostic tests; the direct agglutination test (DAT) and the fast agglutination screening test (FAST) in the diagnosis of Microsporidia in experimentally infected mice and to differentiate between different species of the parasite. The swiss albino mice were divided into non infected control and infected experimental groups which were further subdivided into ten subgroups. Ten samples of microsporidial spores were isolated from ten human stools and each one was used to infect each subgroup of mice. Stool and sera were collected weekly from each subgroup from the 1st to the 4th week post infection (PI). DAT & FAST tests, using antigen prepared from the different species of microsporidial spores were used to detect antibodies in sera of different mice subgroups. The cross reactivity of microsporidial spores with the antibodies of Cyclospora cyatenensis and Cryptosporidium parvum was investigated by DAT & FAST. The results proved that DAT & FAST were effective in detecting microsporidial antibodies in sera of experimentally infected mice from the 2nd week PI till the end of the study, without cross reactivity with C. cyatenensis or C. parvum. They failed to differentiate between different Microspoiridia species used but, they gave good interpretation and they were specific and sensitive, and did not need sophisticated equipments.
Male, Cross Reactions, Spores, Fungal, Sensitivity and Specificity, Mice, Random Allocation, Species Specificity, Agglutination Tests, Microsporidia, Microsporidiosis, Animals, Humans, Antibodies, Fungal
Male, Cross Reactions, Spores, Fungal, Sensitivity and Specificity, Mice, Random Allocation, Species Specificity, Agglutination Tests, Microsporidia, Microsporidiosis, Animals, Humans, Antibodies, Fungal
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
