
To investigate the follow-up results of the prophylactic laser treatment to macular soft drusen in age-related macular degeneration.Prospective, 10 persons with bilateral soft drusen and with good visual acuity were observed for 8 years. 10 eyes were treated. The fellow eyes were as control group. Fluorescein angiography and Amsler test were studied after 8 years. Scanning laser ophthalmoscope was performed after 2 years. Some of them were performed multifocal ERG to test the macular function after 3 years.There is no choroidal neovascularization in both the laser group and the control group. There is no differences in the best corrected visual acuity after 8 years. All eyes had good fovea fixation. Light sensitivity of both eyes had no significant difference to be found by scanning laser ophthalmoscope. The latencies and amplitude densities of the N1 and P1 waves in the central first ring remained unchanged at 3 years post-treatment (before treatment t = -0.779, 0.722, -0.491, 0.286; after treatment t = 1.342, 0.043, 0.937, 0.350; P > 0.05) compared with the fellow eyes.There is no impairment to be found in the macula after preventive laser treatment. The treatment did not demonstrate a clinically significant benefit for choroidal neovascularization in eyes of people with bilateral large drusen.
Aged, 80 and over, Male, Macular Degeneration, Laser Coagulation, Humans, Female, Retinal Drusen, Middle Aged, Aged, Follow-Up Studies
Aged, 80 and over, Male, Macular Degeneration, Laser Coagulation, Humans, Female, Retinal Drusen, Middle Aged, Aged, Follow-Up Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
